Here is another fortified structure I wanted to offer for your consideration. I guess it's all about the proverbial BS meter. This structure definitely set mine off. May be at some point, masses will start questioning the narrative. As it stands, we can only provide some reading material and create a pattern of thinking, analyzing and investigating.
This article is about Fort Santiago located within Intramuros in Manila, Philippins. I already understand that it will be a rather broad topic, full of various issues. Here is what we have:
Manila: history
Images for this article were sitting on my desktop for over a year. I did not know in what logical sequence to approach this story back then, and I am still not sure how to do it. It appears, to get all ducks in a row, we have to touch up on the early history of Manila. In our knowledge we are limited to the conventional wisdom, but in this case it will contribute to pointing out the ridiculousness of the narrative.
Manila is located on the island of Luzon. It is is the largest and most populous island in the Philippines. It is ranked 15th largest in the world by land area.
I'm pretty sure the evolutionists developed a way to explain the presence of black people in the Pacific Ocean, but this is not what this article is about. I just figured it was an interesting detail not to mention. As the story goes, Negritos lived across the island of Luzon before the Malayo-Polynesians migrated in and assimilated them. I am not sure when the assimilation took place, for we can clearly see that in the beginning of the 20th century, Negritos looked pretty unassimilated.
Additionally, I am not sure if the below two quotes from Wikipedia mean the exact same thing. But these quotes are sourced, so decide for yourself.
18th-century engraving of a Philippine karakoa, two lantaka can be seen mounted on the deck.
Source
Moro PeopleTo be honest, these Moors, Moro, Maori start to form a name pattern of their own. How many coincidences do we need to experience, before we start seeing footprints of something big hidden behind those coincidences?
Lantaka CannonsMoros were armed with Lantaka cannons. According to this Wiki article, Philippine government may nominate lantakas to the UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists.
Sources and Links:
As you can see below, the outside walls are gone. Today we can only witness our "average" star-fortress. Well, at least I think the outside walls are gone, for I do not see them in the photographs.
This "everything else" is supposed to be our Intramuros, but Intramuros is incomplete because it is missing its main "muros" walls. Those appear to have been removed by the Americans in 1903. Additional Intramuros damages came during/after the 1945 Battle of Manila. It appears that just about everything of architectural value was destroyed.
The first Spanish fort, a palisaded structure of logs and earth, was destroyed not long after establishment, when in 1574 the Chinese pirate Lin Feng (Limahong) launched an almost successful siege of Manila.
The Spanish army repelled the attack, but the fort, in realization of its defects, was rebuilt in stone. The present fort, constructed using volcanic tuff (adobe), was built between 1589 and 1592. It was named after St. James the Moor-slayer, known by the Spanish as Santiago Matamoros.
The fort has a perimeter of 2,030 feet (620 m), and it is of a nearly triangular form. The 22-foot (6.7 m) high walls, with a thickness of 8 feet (2.4 m) are pierced for the necessary communications. The front gateway façade measures 40 feet (12 m) high being in the south wall and facing the city. The communication with the river and the sea was by an obscure postern gate - the Postigo de la Nuestra Señora del Soledad
IntramurosIntramuros is the 0.67 square kilometres (0.26 sq mi) historic walled area within the modern city of Manila. Intramuros is also called the Walled City, and at the time of the Spanish Empire was synonymous with the City of Manila. Construction of the defensive walls was started by the Spanish imperial government in the late 16th century to protect the city from foreign invasions.
The Americans made drastic changes to the city, such as in 1903, when the walls from the Santo Domingo Gate up to the Almacenes Gate were removed as the wharf on the southern bank of the Pasig River was improved. The stones removed were used for other construction happening around the city. The walls were also breached in four areas to ease access to the city: the southwestern end of Calle Aduana (now Andres Soriano Jr. Ave.); the eastern end of Calle Anda; the northeastern end of Calle Victoria (previously known as Calle de la Escuela); and the southeastern end of Calle Palacio (now General Luna Street). The double moats that surrounded Intramuros were deemed unsanitary and were filled in with mud dredged from Manila Bay where the present Port of Manila is now located. The moats were transformed into a municipal golf course by the city.
PhotographsThis article is getting longer than I expected, but I absolutely have to add a few photographs. None of them do justice to this place, but hopefully they will be able to reflect a small portion of the greatness of the remaining structure. I will add a few, but for more you will have to look those up yourself:
Additional links:
KD Summary: I was gonna cover the hardness of Tuff rock they used to build this thing, but what's the point? Without elaborating, the hardness is 4 to 6 on Moh’s Scale. The detailed info can be looked up here: Tuff Rock - All You Need to Know. You can figure out the rest about how they were cutting this tuff rock in 1590s, and about how they brought this structure's worth of tuff by boat.
In my opinion we are witnessing the remnants of the efforts of those who came before us. I do not believe that López de Legazpi, Goiti or whoever assited, else by Chinese and Filipino workers had anything to do with building this monster. At least not in the context presented to us. They simply did not have a proper infrastructure to accomplish something like this.
Meanwhile we are gonna keep on running into things like this oil painting on the inside of a wooden chest, and dated c. 1640-1650. After the 1645 "earthquake" Manila was reconstructed. By the end of the 17th century, Intramuros had some six hundred houses that were protected by its stone walls. But what do we know? Those people knew two things: how to fight and how to build. Idiots embraces fighter-builders.
Hanging labels on the individuals who deprived us of hour real history is pointless. We have what we have, because we deserve what we have. We stay blind and stay silent. Consuming historical BS appears to be our destiny. One smart, or "in the know" guy, who was probably a part of the PTB allegedly said once:
This article is about Fort Santiago located within Intramuros in Manila, Philippins. I already understand that it will be a rather broad topic, full of various issues. Here is what we have:
- Fort Santiago is a citadel built by Spanish navigator and governor Miguel López de Legazpi for the new established city of Manila in the Philippines.
- LOL: He died in 1572. Fort Santiago was built 1590-93 (other version 1589-92). Allegedly of course it was.
- Intramuros, urban district and historic walled city within Metropolitan Manila, in the Philippines. The name, from the Spanish word meaning “within walls,” refers to the fortified city founded at the mouth of the Pasig River shortly after 1571 by the Spanish conquistador Miguel López de Legazpi.
Manila: history
Images for this article were sitting on my desktop for over a year. I did not know in what logical sequence to approach this story back then, and I am still not sure how to do it. It appears, to get all ducks in a row, we have to touch up on the early history of Manila. In our knowledge we are limited to the conventional wisdom, but in this case it will contribute to pointing out the ridiculousness of the narrative.
- Maynilà, the Filipino name for the city, comes from the phrase may-nilà, which translates to "where indigo is found."
- Luzon was originally inhabited by Negritos before Austronesians from Taiwan scattered and displaced them.
- The word Negrito is the Spanish diminutive of negro, used to mean "little black person". This usage was coined by 16th-century Spanish missionaries operating in the Philippines, and was borrowed by other European travellers and colonialists across Austronesia to label various peoples perceived as sharing relatively small physical stature and dark skin.
I'm pretty sure the evolutionists developed a way to explain the presence of black people in the Pacific Ocean, but this is not what this article is about. I just figured it was an interesting detail not to mention. As the story goes, Negritos lived across the island of Luzon before the Malayo-Polynesians migrated in and assimilated them. I am not sure when the assimilation took place, for we can clearly see that in the beginning of the 20th century, Negritos looked pretty unassimilated.
Additionally, I am not sure if the below two quotes from Wikipedia mean the exact same thing. But these quotes are sourced, so decide for yourself.
- Luzon was originally inhabited by Negritos before Austronesians from Taiwan scattered and displaced them.
- Negritos lived across the island of Luzon before the Malayo-Polynesians migrated in and assimilated them.
- Manila was an active trade partner with the Song and Yuan dynasties. The Tondo district was the traditional capital of the empire, and its rulers were sovereign kings, not mere chieftains.
- This Kingdom of Tondo is probably something to dig into for a later date. I think it has some indicators of the global world-enveloping civilization.
- In the 13th century, Manila consisted of a fortified settlement and trading quarter. It was then settled by the Indianized empire of Majapahit, as recorded in the epic eulogy poem "Nagarakretagama", which described the area's conquest by Maharaja Hayam Wuruk.
- During the reign of the Arab Emir, Sharif Ali's descendant, Sultan Bolkiah, from 1485 to 1521, the Sultanate of Brunei which had seceded from Hindu Majapahit and became a Muslim, had invaded the area. The Bruneians wanted to take advantage of Tondo's strategic position in trade with China and Indonesia and thus attacked its environs and established the Muslim Rajahnate of Maynilà.
- And then came the Spaniards.
Manila: the Spaniards
Historians think we are idiots, and rightfully so. When we blindly accept the unacceptable, TPTB gets braver with each lie they feed us. This is like Hernan Cortes, and Francisco Pizzaro all over again. Arrive with 5 soldiers, form an alliance and conquer by killing millions. This history falsification pattern starts to stand out. Check this stuff out:- On June 24, 1571, the conquistador Miguel López de Legazpi arrived in Manila and declared it a territory of New Spain (Mexico), establishing a city council in what is now the district of Intramuros. He took advantage of a Tondo vs Manila territorial conflict to justify expelling or converting Bruneian Muslim colonists who supported their Manila vassals while his Mexican grandson Juan de Salcedo had a romance with a princess of Tondo, Kandarapa.
- López de Legazpi governed the Philippines for a year before dying suddenly of a stroke in Manila on August 20, 1572 after scolding an aide.
- He died bankrupt, leaving a few pesos behind, due to having spent most of his personal fortune during the conquest.
Miguel López de Legazpi
c. 1502 – August 20, 1572
In 1570, having heard of the rich resources in Luzon, López de Legazpi dispatched Martín de Goiti to explore the northern region with a force of 120 Spaniards.c. 1502 – August 20, 1572
Martín de Goiti
c. 1534 – 1575
c. 1534 – 1575
- López de Legazpi wanted to use Manila's harbor as a base for trade with China.
- Goiti's soldiers in Luzon on May 8, 1570, and camped on the shores of Manila Bay for several weeks, while forming an alliance with the Muslims.
- On May 24, 1570, disputes and hostility erupted between the two groups.
- Tariq Suleiman formed a fleet of two thousand five hundred moros consisting of soldiers from the villages along Manila Bay.
- On May 30, 1570, Bambalito sailed to Tondo with Caracoas and encountered the Spaniards at Bangkusay Channel, headed by Martin de Goiti on June 3, 1571.
- Bambalito and his fleet had lost the battle.
- The Spaniards occupied the Islamized states of Tondo and Maynila.
- There, they defeated most of Tariq Suleiman's, Rajah Matanda's, and Lakan Dula's people.
- The Spaniards marched their armies towards the Pasig River, and occupied the settlements in Manila on June 6, 1570 and burned them.
- Ta-Da: Manila was prepared by Goiti for López de Legazpi.
- KD: So, who are we trading with, China or Mexico? And why did they need an outpost to trade?
- Both groups agreed to organize a city council, consisting of two mayors, twelve councilors and a secretary.
- Miguel López de Legazpi agreed to a peace agreement sealed by betrothing one of his half-caste (Half Aztec and Half Spanish) daughters to Batang Dula, heir apparent of Lakan Dula. Eventually their descendants unified the 3 royal houses of Tariq Suleiman, Rajah Matanda and Lakan Dula with the half-Aztec and half Spanish de Goiti family.
- López de Legazpi established a settlement there on June 24, 1571, and he also ordered the construction of the walled city of Intramuros.
- He proclaimed the town as the island's capital, and the seat of the Spanish government in the East Indies.
- Well, let us see what vessels local population used at the time. Today I Learned, that those were Karakoa vessels.
Karakoa
Karakoa were large outrigger warships from the Philippines. They were used by native Filipinos, notably the Kapampangans and the Visayans, during seasonal sea raids. Karakoa were distinct from other traditional Philippine sailing vessels in that they were equipped with platforms for transporting warriors and for fighting at sea. During peacetime, they were also used as trading ships. Large karakoa, which could carry hundreds of rowers and warriors.- Notably: By the end of the 16th century, the Spanish denounced karakoa ship-building and its usage. It later led to a total ban of the ship and the traditions assigned to it.
18th-century engraving of a Philippine karakoa, two lantaka can be seen mounted on the deck.
Source
Moro People
- From above again: Tariq Suleiman formed a fleet of two thousand five hundred moros consisting of soldiers from the villages along Manila Bay.
- In the 13th century, the arrival of Muslim missionaries from the Persian Gulf.
- In 1457, the introduction of Islam led to the creation of Sultanates.
- That's it. No earlier history is listed.
Lantaka Cannons
Collection of Philippine lantaka in a European museum
Kris & Kalis Swards
I do not know about you, but to me these swords remind of a dystopian movie, the name of which I do not remember. In that movie the society went through some major cataclysmic even. All the technology was lost, and stuff was in a disarray. They had to reuse items they has left from the times before the drastic event took place. Essentially there was a sword made of some driveshaft, or something like that.Kris & Kalis Swards
- Post-submission Edit: I was able to recall the movie. It was not dystopian, but rather a Viking Sci-Fi named Outlander.
Kris
Kalis
As we can see, those natives had some decent vessels and weapons to fight Spaniards. But... you make your own conclusions of how uncivilized they were.Kalis
Sources and Links:
- Manila - Wikipedia
- Luzon - Wikipedia
- Miguel López de Legazpi - Wikipedia
- Martín de Goiti - Wikipedia
- Karakoa - Wikipedia
- Moro people - Wikipedia
Back to Fortifications
Hopefully I'm done with the hard part. Above was my attempt to paint a general picture. It was probably not too successful, but I hope you get an idea of what the PTB version of the events was. We also established two facts:- In 1571 López de Legazpi ordered Intramuros to be built. Meaning it allegedly did not exist prior.
- Fort Santiago a.k.a Citadel Santiago was built between 1590 and 1593.
As you can see below, the outside walls are gone. Today we can only witness our "average" star-fortress. Well, at least I think the outside walls are gone, for I do not see them in the photographs.
Arial View Today
Fort Santiago vs Intramuros
It took me a couple minutes to separate Fort Santiago from Intramuros. I figured I will point out the difference, in case you end up in the same boat. The smaller red-squared structure is Fort Santiago. Everything else to its right is Intramuros.Fort Santiago vs Intramuros
This "everything else" is supposed to be our Intramuros, but Intramuros is incomplete because it is missing its main "muros" walls. Those appear to have been removed by the Americans in 1903. Additional Intramuros damages came during/after the 1945 Battle of Manila. It appears that just about everything of architectural value was destroyed.
- Destruction at the Walled City (Intramuros district) of old Manila in May 1945 - after the Battle of Manila.
The first Spanish fort, a palisaded structure of logs and earth, was destroyed not long after establishment, when in 1574 the Chinese pirate Lin Feng (Limahong) launched an almost successful siege of Manila.
The Spanish army repelled the attack, but the fort, in realization of its defects, was rebuilt in stone. The present fort, constructed using volcanic tuff (adobe), was built between 1589 and 1592. It was named after St. James the Moor-slayer, known by the Spanish as Santiago Matamoros.
The fort has a perimeter of 2,030 feet (620 m), and it is of a nearly triangular form. The 22-foot (6.7 m) high walls, with a thickness of 8 feet (2.4 m) are pierced for the necessary communications. The front gateway façade measures 40 feet (12 m) high being in the south wall and facing the city. The communication with the river and the sea was by an obscure postern gate - the Postigo de la Nuestra Señora del Soledad
Intramuros
- From above: López de Legazpi established a settlement there on June 24, 1571, and he also ordered the construction of the walled city of Intramuros.
Construction of Intramurous
The city was in constant danger of natural and man-made disasters and worse, attacks from foreign invaders. In 1574, a fleet of Chinese pirates led by Limahong attacked the city and destroyed it before the Spaniards drove them away. The colony had to be rebuilt again by the survivors. These attacks prompted the construction of the wall. The city of stone began during the rule of Governor-General Santiago de Vera. He ruled from May 1584 until May 1590.- You can't make this shit up:
- Following the great fire of Manila on March 19, 1583 Santiago de Vera made an order that all construction in Manila should be of stone.
- It was found that stone could be easily cut near the banks of the Pasig in Guadalupe and brought to Manila in boats.
- Gómez Pérez Dasmariñas ruled June 1, 1590 until October 25, 1593
- Leonardo Iturriano, a Spanish military engineer specializing in fortifications, headed the project.
- Chinese and Filipino workers built the walls.
- Fort Nuestra Señora de Guia aka Baluarte de San Diego
- Funds came from a monopoly on playing cards and fines imposed on its excessive play.
- That's exactly what you would start doing if you were just conquered, right?
- Chinese goods were taxed for two years.
1903: Outer Wall Destruction
After the end of the Spanish-American War, Spain surrendered the Philippines and several other territories to the United States as part of the terms of the Treaty of Paris for $20 million. The American flag was raised at Fort Santiago on August 13, 1898 indicating the start of American rule over the city.
Photographs
KD Summary: I was gonna cover the hardness of Tuff rock they used to build this thing, but what's the point? Without elaborating, the hardness is 4 to 6 on Moh’s Scale. The detailed info can be looked up here: Tuff Rock - All You Need to Know. You can figure out the rest about how they were cutting this tuff rock in 1590s, and about how they brought this structure's worth of tuff by boat.
In my opinion we are witnessing the remnants of the efforts of those who came before us. I do not believe that López de Legazpi, Goiti or whoever assited, else by Chinese and Filipino workers had anything to do with building this monster. At least not in the context presented to us. They simply did not have a proper infrastructure to accomplish something like this.
Meanwhile we are gonna keep on running into things like this oil painting on the inside of a wooden chest, and dated c. 1640-1650. After the 1645 "earthquake" Manila was reconstructed. By the end of the 17th century, Intramuros had some six hundred houses that were protected by its stone walls. But what do we know? Those people knew two things: how to fight and how to build. Idiots embraces fighter-builders.
Hanging labels on the individuals who deprived us of hour real history is pointless. We have what we have, because we deserve what we have. We stay blind and stay silent. Consuming historical BS appears to be our destiny. One smart, or "in the know" guy, who was probably a part of the PTB allegedly said once:
- He who does not know his past cannot make the best of his present and future, for it is from the past that we learn.
Where did it go?