Search results

"built between 1539 and 1580"

A very long and very interesting interview with the French recentist Didier Lacapelle on the subject of chronology with tons of examinations of maps and identification of "ancient" characters with people living during the Renaissance. MUST WATCH

Here Fomenko touches the topic of AI, expecially about the processing of texts using their methods to obtain more chronological data. ... and Nosovsky's opinion.

Merry Christmas everybody. As usual this time of the year Santa Claus is entering our houses through our chimneys to leave us some presents. This year we were particularly good so he decided to give us a "nativity-scene-like" back from the year 79 AD, because everybody knows how the "ancient"...

Here a simple example of how historians tend to apply their "methods" in a random way. In a previous source mentioned by KD we read: So basically historians claim that the regional geography was always like today because of a couple reasons: An "ancient" geographer and traveller supposedly...

I agree on this point but how do you explain the extraordinary misplacement of Samarkand. I've seen multiple maps placing cities where they should not be but most of the time in the near vicinity of their present location. It seems Smarkand is a cmpletely different beast. So we have to consider...

My experience tells me there's a cathegory even worse than the "sceptical censor", which is the "anonymous lick-giver"... sorry I meant to say "like-giver". The kind of people who cannot follow the flow of a discussion and have a tendency at interrupt it not understanding the simple mechanism of...

I'll give you one for each because it would be very time consuming. Obviously this is very subjective and I'll tell you why later. When it comes to what made immediately sense to me right from the start is that Fomenko points out the extraordinary similarity between the "Crusaders period" and...

You don't understand what I'm saying. Once again for the last time. People cannot verify what Fomenko does because we are not mathematicians. It's not about the sources but how they use them. Do you get it now? Arw you one of those? This conversation is getting more and more absurd... What...

Ok I said it was my last word but I want to try again. You don't have to worry about people falling from propaganda by Fomenko through these Lutheran Chronograh because normal people don't actually have the tools to verify what Fomenko is doing. So if you want to convince me (or us) that you...

Last word. It means that you are waisting my time and YOUR time at this point AND it also means that we are both filling a thread with useless arguings over things that would be easily solved by reading the source (Fomenko).

Oh my God! Ok you have low IQ. Are you happy now? Do you realize all the stuff you are posting comes from Fomenko? Do you realize it is a reinterpretation, aka a "theory"? Do you realize this is not the original message which you don't know because you have read nothing? Do you realize no one...

I feel like the reason why @BusyBaci was talking about that sort of naivety we encounter every now and then from the part of those who haven't read "recentist literature" or haven't read enough is that they pose questions which they should not pose if they actually did their job in completing...

Sorry if I may sound trivial, but I think you are projecting a bit there. I didn't speak of "Authorities" with a capital A, nor I'm suggesting we should take one as such, but denying Fomenko as an authority in the field of chronology is somewhat disingenuous. So what I'm saying is that Fomenko...

By the way, some years ago I compiled a scheme of dates based on Marful's shift with the data at disposal on his website. I leave it here if anybody is interested in using it.

ChatGPT is in fact now giving me many other possible sources. One of them contains at least Dionysius name. It's the "Romani calendarii a Gregorio XIII. P. M. restituti explicatio" by Christophorus Clavius. Other supposed texts and authors are: "Responsio ad disputationem de Paschate" by the...

One thing to say is that in 525 AD Dionysius supposedly found out (with an error of three years if I remember correctly) that the astronomical conditions present during Christ's birth were going to repeat themselves in the year 532 AD. So if we take in consideration Jesus' birth according to...

I don't know if they were one and the same. There's multiple extremely weird things to solve when you go into the specifics. In any case I asked ChatGPT who published Dionysius Exiguus's Easter table for the first time (it calls them "Dionysian tables") and it says it was Kepler who did it in...